TLDR: <add summary>
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd51/ffd516812320e97e212594aadfb7fdbc0e19c297" alt="DefinitionOfDone-Artwork-04"
Definition of Done
As a UXer,the agile concept, the Definition of Done (DoD). But how does it affect me is another question. Recently I have been invited to a couple of chats while looking at potential career opportunities, in one of them, one Dev Lead was interested in my DoD – so after, I decided I’d research, from a UX perspective, if this was something I should know as many projects fails because ‘done’ is poorly defined.
Provide transparency
Having a clear DoD helps Scrum Teams work together more collaboratively, increases transparency, and ultimately results in the development of consistently higher quality software.
The general censuses is three-part. First, code is produced or completed, second code is commented, and lastly code is checked in. This is a very simple DoD, but it works. It works for Dev Teams, but how does the UXer fit into this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abf1f/abf1fca8281058f30ee8c7a47ae3d72988ef6e0b" alt="DefinitionOfDone-Artwork-02"
Developed, or signed-off
It has been proposed that approval by Product Owner is the third step, but it doesn’t necessarily mean styled, so my thoughts would be that un-styled functionality is a big ask to sign off. Also, it doesn’t mean tested. It just means developed.
“DONE!” should mean shippable. I have heard the phrase “done done done”, this usually means it has been reviewed (both design review and code review) – and everything is tickety-bo. Sorry.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca070/ca07066f3ef3ae792a02be05f8aad15c2cb5ee65" alt="DefinitionOfDone-Artwork-03"
Comments
One response to “Definition of Done – for a UXer”
Definition of Done for a UXer http://t.co/497KCh4n70 #agile #UX